Rank | Prev. Rank |
TEAM | Record | Weighted Metric |
2013-14 Metric Rank |
AP Rank |
1 | 10 | Louisville | (8-1, 0-0) | 6.643 | 8 | 6 |
2 | 1 | Arizona | (9-0, 0-0) | 11.755 | 10 | 1 |
3 | 5 | Memphis | (6-1, 0-0) | 12.313 | 5 | 16 |
4 | 12 | Florida | (6-2, 0-0) | 16.169 | 9 | 19 |
5 | 6 | Oklahoma St | (8-1, 0-0) | 16.28 | 2 | 7 |
6 | 4 | Pittsburgh | (9-0, 0-0) | 16.61 | 14 | 28 |
7 | 2 | Ohio State | (8-0, 0-0) | 16.85 | 17 | 3 |
8 | 3 | Syracuse | (9-0, 0-0) | 17.265 | 24 | 2 |
9 | 11 | Wisconsin | (10-0, 0-0) | 18.45 | 21 | 4 |
10 | 7 | Villanova | (9-0, 0-0) | 20.53 | 3 | 10 |
11 | 8 | Kansas | (6-2, 0-0) | 20.679 | 31 | 13 |
12 | 20 | UCLA | (8-1, 0-0) | 22.355 | 11 | 26 |
13 | 16 | Wichita St | (9-0, 0-0) | 24.13 | 7 | 12 |
14 | 22 | Colorado | (9-1, 0-0) | 24.548 | 4 | 21 |
15 | 9 | Iowa State | (7-0, 0-0) | 24.727 | 26 | 17 |
16 | 13 | Michigan St | (7-1, 0-0) | 26.095 | 22 | 5 |
17 | 24 | Iowa | (10-1, 0-0) | 27.07 | 1 | 23 |
18 | 26 | Baylor | (8-1, 0-0) | 27.342 | 34 | 14 |
19 | 14 | Duke | (7-2, 0-0) | 27.794 | 60 | 8 |
20 | 21 | Oregon | (8-0, 0-0) | 29.805 | 30 | 15 |
21 | 40 | Missouri | (9-0, 0-0) | 29.81 | 32 | 24 |
22 | 19 | Kentucky | (7-2, 0-0) | 30.415 | 16 | 11 |
23 | 29 | Minnesota | (8-2, 0-0) | 31.585 | 19 | NR |
24 | 17 | Indiana | (7-2, 0-0) | 33.014 | 46 | 35 |
25 | 15 | San Diego St | (7-1, 0-0) | 34.565 | 23 | 25 |
26 | 28 | Marquette | (5-4, 0-0) | 34.779 | 41 | NR |
27 | 42 | New Mexico | (7-1, 0-0) | 35.561 | 13 | 27 |
28 | NR | N Carolina | (6-2, 0-0) | 35.653 | 6 | 18 |
29 | 18 | Connecticut | (9-0, 0-0) | 35.671 | 64 | 9 |
30 | 27 | Arkansas | (6-2, 0-0) | 35.805 | 15 | NR |
31 | 32 | Gonzaga | (8-1, 0-0) | 37.983 | 29 | 20 |
32 | 39 | U Mass | (8-0, 0-0) | 38.302 | 36 | 22 |
33 | 25 | Michigan | (6-3, 0-0) | 38.338 | 12 | 30 |
34 | 30 | BYU | (7-3, 0-0) | 39.03 | 33 | NR |
35 | 23 | Dayton | (7-2, 0-0) | 41.331 | 37 | 32 |
36 | 33 | Cincinnati | (7-1, 0-0) | 41.555 | 47 | 33 |
37 | 37 | VCU | (8-2, 0-0) | 43.162 | 58 | 31 |
38 | 38 | Butler | (7-2, 0-0) | 44.224 | 45 | NR |
39 | 34 | Virginia | (7-3, 0-0) | 44.964 | 18 | NR |
40 | 44 | Belmont | (8-2, 0-0) | 45.808 | 77 | NR |
41 | 46 | LSU | (5-2, 0-0) | 47.749 | 39 | NR |
42 | 41 | St Marys | (7-0, 0-0) | 48.415 | 55 | 35 |
43 | 31 | California | (6-3, 0-0) | 49.929 | 25 | NR |
44 | 48 | Mississippi | (6-2, 0-0) | 50.654 | 48 | NR |
45 | 36 | Saint Louis | (8-2, 0-0) | 51.57 | 57 | NR |
46 | 35 | Oklahoma | (8-1, 0-0) | 52.29 | 51 | 39 |
47 | 50 | George Washington | (8-1, 0-0) | 54.377 | 40 | 37 |
48 | 47 | Florida St | (6-3, 0-0) | 55.35 | 27 | NR |
49 | NR | Charlotte | (7-2, 0-0) | 55.357 | 94 | NR |
50 | 43 | Texas | (8-1, 0-0) | 57.175 | 43 | NR |
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
2013-14 Statistical College Basketball Rankings, Vol. IV
Below are my Top 50 rankings through games played on Monday, 12/9. Thanks to the schizophrenic start to the North Carolina basketball season, I noticed a flaw in how harsh I penalize teams for bad losses. The end result had Carolina rated 51st. Yes they lost home to Belmont and away to UAB, but they beat Louisville home and Michigan State away. Surely that means they are better than 51st. Before, a good win home/away was worth 'x'/'2x'; respectively. Conversely, a bad loss home/away was worth '-2x'/'-x'. Now the bad losses are basically worth '-x'/'-x/2'; respectively for home/away. So after invoking the 'Carolina Rule' I feel these rankings are a more accurate representation. The side affect is that a team may move up, despite having an average week, or not even playing at all. Also, I continue the trend of decreasing the weights of last year's ranks as well as offseason recruiting rankings, and increasing the value of this year's metric rank - which is now 52% of the weighted metric. Overall, the Top 50 is showing signs of stabilization with only two new teams this week. North Carolina and Charlotte replaced Stanford and Arizona State. Meanwhile, Maryland remains unable to flirt with the Top 50, currently rated 66th.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment